Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Enzo Kohlmann De Freitas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Freitas has demonstrated a slight edge over Almeida, winning 46.95% of second serve points compared to Almeida's 44.37%. Could this advantage influence the match outcome? It very well might.
• Return Game Prowess: Almeida outshines Freitas in return stats on opponents' second serves with 49.34% against Freitas’s 46.47%. However, Freitas performs better on first serve returns at 32.85% compared to Almeida's 26.8%.
• Under Pressure: Freitas shows marginally better breakpoint saving efficiency with 54.21% versus Almeida's 53.31%, a potential factor in crucial match moments.
• Performance Overview: Both players have similar win rates over the last year, with Almeida slightly ahead at 61.54% compared to Freitas's 61.11% in terms of match victories.
• Surface Preference: While both perform best on clay, Almeida has a higher win percentage at 60% compared to Freitas's 56%. Does this hint at an advantage for Almeida on clay?
• Player Level and Experience: Freitas has been more dominant in lower-tier tournaments, winning 67.74% of such matches, while Almeida has played higher-level tournaments with a 58.49% win rate, gaining experience against tougher competition.
• Opponent Quality: Freitas typically faces stronger opposition, with their opponents holding an average rank of 244.94, while Almeida's opponents average a rank of 342.42. What does this indicate about potential matchup outcomes?
• Deciding Set Performance: If the match extends to a deciding set, Freitas might have the upper hand, winning 67% of such scenarios compared to Almeida’s 47%.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Freitas also holds an edge in converting breakpoint opportunities, effectively utilizing 33.6% of chances, as opposed to Almeida’s 28.92%.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis match, the battle appears closely contested with both players showing commendable performance patterns. While Almeida displays stronger proficiency in return games, Freitas shows steadiness in converting breakpoints and handling high-pressure scenarios.

Analyzing surface preferences, both excel on clay, yet Almeida’s experience in facing stronger opponents at higher tournament levels positions them as a tougher competitor.

Nonetheless, considering Freitas’s prowess in dealing with deciding sets and superior breakpoint conversion, Freitas might possess a slight edge, possibly steering the match in their favor.

Combining all statistical insights, Freitas emerges as the marginal favorite to claim victory in this upcoming match, though the contest is expected to be competitive and entertaining.